
Disclosure of easements, conditions, and restrictions is a must. For example, a buyer recently walked on a contract because the seller had failed to disclose a building easement benefitting the next door neighbor. Neither the property disclosure statement nor any marketing materials made mention of the easement which, arguably, presented a future marketability issue to the prospective buyer. Paragraph #17 of the GCAAR Regional Sales Contract does permit conveyance of title subject to commonly acceptable easements, however a building easement (i.e., an agreement permitting the neighbor to build on a portion of the seller’s property) is certainly not on par with a public utility easement for running of gas and electric lines. The reason being is that a building easement gives rise to the issue of marketability, another requirement of title under the terms of the contract.
As a result of the seller’s failure to disclose, the buyer declared the contract void on the basis of a faulty disclosure and the fact that title was arguably unmarketable.
Related Articles

Why Paper Checks Don't Pass the Closing Test
Why title companies require wire transfers over cashier's checks at closing, and how to protect yourself from wire fraud…

Official-Looking Mail vs. Your Wallet: A Scam Spotting Guide
A guide to spotting two common scams targeting new LLC owners and homeowners — fake annual report fees and deed copy sol…

More Than a Closing Company
When a last-minute gas service issue threatened a closing, Federal Title's attorneys stepped in to protect the buyer whi…
Ready to Get Started?
Get a guaranteed quote from Federal Title — attorney-led, consumer driven since 1996.
